Your strongest proof — "4x-10x more traffic" — is buried where buyers who already left will never see it.
“[Book a demo](https://www.marketmuse.com/book-demo/) | [Book a demo](https://www.marketmuse.com/book-demo/) | [Book a...”
Put a real number on each paid tier and replace 'Book a demo' with a direct signup button. Reserve the demo path for your highest tier if you need it, but let the Optimize and Research tiers convert without a human in the loop.
Get the ship-ready rewrite →Every tier — including Free — sends visitors to 'Book a demo' with no dollar amount in sight. Your pricing page names features but hides cost entirely, forcing a sales call before anyone can self-qualify. In an established category where...
Not five scoring areas. Five questions, asked in sequence. The page is judged on how many it answers before the visitor gives up.
The page has no category frame, which means it can't win the comparison the buyer is already running.
▸ Read the full takeCollapseA content manager who lands here has already looked at Clearscope, Surfer SEO, and possibly SEMrush. The hero — "Create the content that counts" — tells them nothing about which category MarketMuse competes in or why it beats the tools they've already tabbed. The subheadline gestures at topical authority and competitor gaps, which is the actual differentiation, but buries it behind "AI-powered software," a phrase every competitor on the buyer's shortlist also uses. The move: rewrite the hero to name the specific category frame MarketMuse wins — not "content marketing software" but something like "content strategy by topical authority" — and make the competitor contrast explicit in the first ten words the buyer reads, not the fifth sentence of the body.
The page sends a solution-aware buyer to a demo gate, and that mismatch is costing conversions.
▸ Read the full takeCollapseThe ICP — a content manager or strategist at a mid-market B2B team — doesn't book demos for tools in this category. They trial, they explore, they compare outputs. Every competitor they've already evaluated let them in without a call. "Book a demo" as the sole CTA signals enterprise sales motion to a buyer who came here expecting self-serve access. The pricing page exists, which means there's a self-serve path somewhere — but the homepage never offers it. Add a self-serve trial CTA above the fold alongside the demo option; let the buyer segment themselves rather than forcing every visitor through a sales conversation they didn't come for.
The proof on the page is strong but positioned where it does the least work.
▸ Read the full takeCollapseFour named testimonials with roles and companies — Sumo Logic, TentCraft, Orbit Media Studios — are the most credible assets on the page, and they appear after the feature list, after the body copy, after the buyer has already formed a first impression. The Zoe Hawkins quote ("4x-10x more traffic") is the single most conversion-relevant sentence on the entire page; it belongs in the first thing the visitor sees, not in the scroll. Move at least one named testimonial with a specific outcome claim into the hero section, directly beneath the headline, before any feature description appears.
“Position: mid-page (pricing / features). Status: destination server returned an error. URL reached: n/a.”
“[Book a demo](https://www.marketmuse.com/book-demo/) | [Book a demo](https://www.marketmuse.com/book-demo/) | [Book a demo](https://www.marketmuse.com/book-demo/) | [Book a demo](https://www.marketmuse.com/book-demo/)”
“No free-trial callout, no money-back language, no 'see results in X minutes' framing, and no mention of what the demo commitment actually costs in time or obligation -- all absent in the immediate vicinity of the primary 'Book a demo' CTA.”
Every finding named, quoted, and paired with the rewrite — that’s how Lytms reads a page. Run it on your own site to see all of yours, free.
Call-to-action clarity, visual weight, offer strength, form friction, CTA-to-page match.
Proof architecture, named-customer recognition, imagery authenticity, claim-vs-evidence gaps.
A live feed of what the category is moving toward, with a drafted response for the moves worth responding to.
Pick one competitor on Pro. Same scoring this page is held to. Same-day alert when they ship a homepage change.
Mine reviews, transcripts, support, social. Ranked, attributed, matched against the homepage.
Accept, edit, ship. An action queue tied to a CMS or copied straight to clipboard.
Lytms reads any B2B homepage the same way — verdict, five scores, every line that costs the visit. Free to run. Full report and drafted rewrites on Pro.
The body copy names four distinct problems the buyer has, then lists five distinct features MarketMuse provides, without ever connecting a specific problem to a specific feature.
▸ Read the full takeCollapse"It's hard to differentiate your content from competitors" is a real pain — but the page never says which feature solves it. "You're missing opportunities to take advantage of your existing topical authority" is a real pain — but the page doesn't show the buyer what that looks like fixed. The page educates in parallel columns (problems, then features) rather than in sequence (here's your problem, here's exactly what changes). Restructure the body so each problem statement is immediately followed by the specific capability that resolves it, with one concrete example or outcome attached — this is the structure that moves a solution-aware buyer from "interesting" to "I need to try this."