Brand landing pages, scored.
Curated set of B2B SaaS landing pages — Stripe, Notion, Linear, Vercel, Cursor, Figma, and more. Every brand scored on the same rubric. Click any brand for the full diagnosis.
Buyers came asking about failed payment recovery, smart routing, and billing logic — the page answers with a category label.
Read the full scan →Your biggest trust objection — the $5M FDIC coverage — lands after six sections selling features to buyers who already left.
Read the full scan →Free tier pricing signals a self-serve buyer; every proof point on the page was built for a CFO.
Read the full scan →Three buyer segments, one CTA — the page can't close what it refuses to choose.
Read the full scan →Your page hides the one thing developers actually decide on — pricing — behind a sales call no one wants to make.
Read the full scan →The hero claims "AI Cloud"; the page beneath it is five parallel product catalogs with no buyer picked.
Read the full scan →Your best competitive proof — a customer dismissing Mailgun, SendGrid, and Mandrill by name — is buried in a carousel.
Read the full scan →Your sharpest claim — sub-second cold starts — appears once, then disappears while four other promises take over.
Read the full scan →Developer tools selling to engineers win when the product sells itself before the pitch does. Your hero buries the real hook — 'millions of developers' is a thr…
Read the full scan →The page promises "AI-driven root cause analysis" and "actionable alerts" — terms buyers search for — but never demonstrates either.
Read the full scan →Your hero claims enterprise scale; the only action it offers is a free signup with no price in sight.
Read the full scan →Analyst badges lead; customers ask for reliability and transparent pricing — neither appears anywhere on this page.
Read the full scan →GitHub's landing page relies on brand dominance and social proof scale (150M+ users) rather than persuasive copywriting — the headline is a platitude, the value…
Read the full scan →Your hero promises proactive AI; your proof section names one stakeholder managing marketing metrics.
Read the full scan →The page declares "issue tracking is dead" then spends five sections proving Linear is a better issue tracker.
Read the full scan →Your hero commits to a product that doesn't exist yet on the page that follows it.
Read the full scan →Kieran Flanagan's testimonial nails what Loom is — the hero doesn't, and it's buried in a carousel.
Read the full scan →The page claims Slackbot is the differentiation, then demonstrates it entirely through Claude, Copilot, and Agentforce — other companies' AI.
Read the full scan →Your hero promises AI; every customer you quote chose Asana to replace a conversation or a spreadsheet.
Read the full scan →Your hero promises "all your teams connected"; four disconnected product launches below it prove the opposite.
Read the full scan →Your hero confirms what every buyer already believes; the page never says why Calendly beats doing nothing.
Read the full scan →Eight products, no named customers, one CTA — the page can't convert a buyer it never chose.
Read the full scan →Your hero speaks to marketers; the first scroll hands them to a designer-mode feature tour.
Read the full scan →Your hero sells "free" to freelancers; every testimonial on the page was written by a design lead at a funded company.
Read the full scan →The page's strongest proof — Jensen Huang, Patrick Collison — answers enterprise procurement, not the download CTA it's attached to.
Read the full scan →Your hero says "forget about infrastructure"; your pricing table asks buyers to reason about six GPU tiers.
Read the full scan →Buyers came to compare; the page gives them a mission statement.
Read the full scan →The page fights for four positions — fastest, easiest, most scalable, most isolated — and owns none.
Read the full scan →The page names Google and Microsoft as proof, but shows them as contributors — not one word about what any enterprise team actually deployed.
Read the full scan →